The amount of viral stock was optimized to obtain the maximal protein yield

The amount of viral stock was optimized to obtain the maximal protein yield. be accommodated in the postfusion form. Thus, we hypothesized that some insertion mutants were nonfunctional due to being trapped in a prefusion form. Here, we generated five insertion mutants as soluble ectodomains and characterized them biochemically. We show that this ectodomains of all five mutants assume conformations similar to that of the wild-type gB730. Four mutants have biochemical properties and overall structures that are indistinguishable from those of the wild-type gB730. We conclude that these mutants undergo only minor local conformational changes to relieve the steric strain resulting from the presence of 5 extra amino acids. Interestingly, one mutant, while able to adopt the overall postfusion structure, displays significant conformational AP24534 (Ponatinib) differences in the vicinity of fusion loops, relative to wild-type gB730. Moreover, this mutant has a diminished ability to associate with liposomes, suggesting that this fusion loops in this mutant have decreased functional activity. We propose that these insertions cause a fusion-deficient phenotype not by preventing conversion of gB AP24534 (Ponatinib) to a postfusion-like conformation but rather by interfering with other gB functions. Herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) is the prototype of the diverse herpesvirus family that includes many notable human pathogens (26). In addition to the icosahedral capsid and the tegument that surround its double-stranded DNA genome, herpesviruses have an envelopean outer lipid bilayerbearing a number of surface glycoproteins. During contamination, HSV-1 must fuse its envelope with a cellular membrane in order to deliver the capsid into a target host cell. Among its viral glycoproteins, only glycoprotein C (gC), gB, gD, gH, and gL participate in this entry process, and only the last four are required for fusion (28). Although gD is found only in alphaherpesviruses, all herpesviruses encode gB, gH, and gL, which constitute their core fusion machinery. Of these three proteins, gB is the most highly conserved. We recently decided the crystal structure of a nearly full-length ectodomain of HSV-1 gB, gB730 (18). The crystal structure of the ectodomain of gB from Epstein-Barr computer virus, another herpesvirus, has also been subsequently determined (4). The two structures showed similarities between gB and other Rabbit Polyclonal to Collagen V alpha1 viral fusion proteins, in particular, G from an unrelated vesicular stomatitis computer virus (VSV) (25), leading to the hypothesis that gB is usually a fusogen, presumably directly involved in bringing the viral and host cell membranes together to enable their fusion. However, gB alone is known to be insufficient for membrane fusion; the gH/gL heterodimer is also required. This insufficiency raises the question of exactly how gB functions during viral entry. Answering this question is critical for understanding the complex mechanism that herpesviruses use to enter their host cells. In acting as a viral fusogen, gB must undergo dramatic conformational changes, refolding through a series of conformational intermediates from its initial, or prefusion form, to its final, or postfusion form (15). These conformational changes are not only necessary to bring the two membranes into proximity; they are also thought to provide the energy for the fusion process. The prefusion form corresponds to the protein present around the viral surface prior to initiation of fusion. The postfusion form represents the protein after fusion of the viral and host cell membranes. The available gB structure likely represents its postfusion form, since it shares more in common with the postfusion rather than the prefusion structure of vesicular stomatitis AP24534 (Ponatinib) computer virus (VSV) G (3,17). However, the prefusion form has not yet been characterized. Recently, a panel of gB mutants was generated by using random linker-insertion mutagenesis (21). Of these mutants, 16 were particularly interesting because they were nonfunctional in cell-cell fusion assays despite being expressed around the cell surface at levels that indicate proper folding for transport. These observations suggested that each insertion somehow interfered with gB function. Insertions in 12 of these mutants are located within the available structure of the gB ectodomain, which allowed Lin and Spear to analyze their locations (21). The most prominent examples of such nonfunctional mutants are two mutants with insertions after residues I185 or E187, henceforth referred to as cavity mutants because both I185 and E187 point.